Contact FAQ Help News Page index Search Site map

Methods, Documents

This page contains documents on participation and participatory approaches, stakeholder analysis, and social analysis, together with related tools and resources, as submitted by group members and others.

The knowledge available on this page is based on suggestions from users like yourself. The email address to be used to contribute your own documents is available on this page. Documents will will be converted to PDF format and optimized prior to uploading.


Documents

Participation and participatory approaches

(Information to be added)


Stakeholder analysis

  1. ActionAid / ActionAid Uganda. 2004. “Rethinking participation. Questions for civil society about the limits of participation in PRSPs.” Discussion paper. Washington DC, United States: ActionAid USA. [access]
  2. Bianchi, Robert R. and Sherrie A. Kossoudji. 2001. Interest groups and organizations and stakeholders. “Social Development Papers,” no. 35, June 2001. Washington DC, United States: World Bank. [access]
  3. Chevalier, Jacques. 2001. “Stakeholder analysis and natural resource management.” Ottawa, Canada: Carleton University. [access]
  4. Council of Microfinance Equity Funds. 2011. “Aligning stakeholder interests in NGO transformations. Emerging good practices.” Washington DC, United States: Center for Financial Inclusion, Accion International. [access]
  5. Borrini-Feyerabend, Grazia, ed. 1997. Beyond fences: Seeking social sustainability in conservation. 2 vols. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN).
  6. Dick, Bob. 1997. “Stakeholder analysis.” (online). [access]
  7. Environment Council. n.d. “Principles of authentic engagement.” [access]
  8. GIZ. 2011. Stakeholder dialogues. Manual. Eschborn, Germany: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit. [access]
  9. Huch, Michael. 2010. “Identification and characterisation of the main stakeholder group for ‘ICT for Ageing’ solutions.” Belfast, Northern Ireland: Bridging Research in Ageing and ICT Development (BRAID), Queens University Belfast. [access]
  10. IFC. 2007. “Stakeholder identification and analysis.” Washington DC, United States: International Finance Corporation. Washington DC, USA: International Finance Corporation. [access]
  11. IFC. 2007. Stakeholder engagement: A good practice handbook for companies doing business in emerging markets. Washington DC, USA: International Finance Corporation. [access]
  12. LinkedIn. 2011. “Stakeholder analysis.” August-September 2011. Contribution to a discussion in the group “Project development and implementation / Monitoring and evaluation.” [access]
  13. LinkedIn. 2011. “Stakeholder analysis.” August-September 2011. Contribution to a discussion in the group “Development and aid experts.” [access]
  14. MindTools. 2010. “Power/interest grid for stakeholder prioritization.” London, United Kingdom: MindTools. [access]
  15. MindTools. 2011. “Stakeholder analysis. Winning support for your projects.” London, United Kingdom: MindTools. [access]
  16. MindTools. 2011. “Stakeholder communications worksheet.” London, United Kingdom: MindTools. [access]
  17. MindTools. 2011. “Stakeholder management. Planning stakeholder communication.” London, United Kingdom: MindTools. [access]
  18. Mozammel, Masud and Barbara Zatlokal. 2002. “Strategic communication in PRSP.” Draft. Washington DC, United States: World Bank. [access]
  19. ODI. 2009. “Planning tools: Stakeholder analysis.” Manual/Toolkit, January 2009. (online) London, United Kingdom: Overseas Development Institute (ODI). [access]
  20. ODI. 2009. “Context assessment: influence mapping.” Manual/Toolkit, January 2009. (online) London, United Kingdom: Overseas Development Institute (ODI). [access]
  21. ODI. 2009. “Mapping political context: stakeholder analysis.” Manual/Toolkit, January 2009. (online) London, United Kingdom: Overseas Development Institute (ODI). [access]
  22. ODI. 2009. “Mapping political context: drivers of change.” Manual/Toolkit, January 2009. (online) London, United Kingdom: Overseas Development Institute (ODI). [access]
  23. ODI. 2009. “Mapping political context: world governance assessment.” Manual/Toolkit, January 2009. (online) London, United Kingdom: Overseas Development Institute (ODI). [access]
  24. ODI. 2009. “Mapping political context: democracy and governance assessment.” Manual/Toolkit, January 2009. (online) London, United Kingdom: Overseas Development Institute (ODI). [access]
  25. ODI. 2009. “Mapping political context: governance questionnaire.” Manual/Toolkit, January 2009. (online) London, United Kingdom: Overseas Development Institute (ODI). [access]
  26. ODI. 2009. “Mapping political context: power analysis.” Manual/Toolkit, January 2009. (online) London, United Kingdom: Overseas Development Institute (ODI). [access]
  27. ODI. 2009. “Mapping political context: governance matters / country diagnostics.” Manual/Toolkit, January 2009. (online) London, United Kingdom: Overseas Development Institute (ODI). [access]
  28. ODI. 2009. “Mapping political context: civil society index.” Manual/Toolkit, January 2009. (online) London, United Kingdom: Overseas Development Institute (ODI). [access]
  29. OECD. 2006. Applying strategic environmental assessment. Good practice guidance for development co-operation. DAC Guidelines and Reference Series. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. [access]
  30. PM Hut. 2007. “Project communications - keeping stakeholders informed.” (online) Montreal, Canada: Project Management Hut. [access]
  31. PM Hut. 2007. “Stakeholder analysis and stakeholder management.” (online) Montreal, Canada: Project Management Hut. [access]
  32. PM Hut. 2007. “Stakeholders.” (online) Montreal, Canada: Project Management Hut. [access]
  33. PM Hut. 2007. “Stakeholders and picking the right project.” (online) Montreal, Canada: Project Management Hut. [access]
  34. PM Hut. 2008. “What is stakeholder analysis - Part 1.” (online) Montreal, Canada: Project Management Hut. [access]
  35. PM Hut. 2008. “What is stakeholder analysis - Part 2.” (online) Montreal, Canada: Project Management Hut. [access]
  36. PM Hut. 2008. “What is stakeholder analysis - Part 3.” (online) Montreal, Canada: Project Management Hut. [access]
  37. PM Hut. 2009. “Stakeholder management overview.” (online) Montreal, Canada: Project Management Hut. [access]
  38. PRCDP. 2005. “Participation manual.” Prepared for the Poor Rural Communities Development Project (PRCSP). Prepared by PRCDP with ITAD, for DFID/World Bank. London, United Kingdom & Washington DC, United States: DFID & World Bank. [access]
  39. Rietbergen-McCracken, Jennifer, et al. 1998. Stakeholder analysis, Module II. In: Participation and social assessment. Washington DC, United States: World Bank. [access]
  40. Rietbergen-McCracken, Jennifer, et al. 1998. Stakeholder analysis, Worksheets. In: Participation and social assessment. Washington DC, United States: World Bank. [access]
  41. Rietbergen-McCracken, Jennifer, et al. 1998. Tools and techniques. In: Participation and social assessment. Washington DC, United States: World Bank. [access]
  42. Santcross, Nick. n.d. “Stakeholder analysis.” [unknown] [access]
  43. ScenarioPlus. 2003. “A simple stakeholder template for projects.” [access]
  44. Schmeer, Kammi. 1999. Guidelines for conducting a stakeholder analysis. Health Reform Tools Series. A Partnership for Health Reform Publication. Bethesda, Maryland, United States: Abt Associates Inc. [access]
  45. Schmeer, Kammi. 2001. Stakeholder analysis guidelines. Washington DC, United States: Pan American Health Organization, World Health Organization. [access]
  46. Smith, Larry W. 2000. Project clarity through stakeholder analysis, CrossTalk, December 2000, p 4-9. [access]
  47. Snyder, Lewis W., etal. 2003. “Dying to reach the negotiating table: will parity in casualties push israel and the Palestinians to accept a lasting ceasfire?” Preliminary discussion draft. Claremont, California, United States: School of Politics and Economics, Claremont Graduate University. [access]
  48. Soeftestad, Lars T. 2005. “Social assessment.” Yemen Rainfed Agriculture and Livestock Project. Washington DC, United States: World Bank.
  49. Soeftestad, Lars T. 2011. “Protected areas in transition economies: Stakeholders, resources and change in Calimani National Park and Tara Dornelor, Romania.” Paper presented at the European conference of the International Association for the Study of Commons (IASC), Plovdiv, Bulgaria, 14-17 September 2011. [access]
  50. Sokolova, Marina. 2006. Advocacy democracy modes: benefits and limitations, Informacijos Mokslai. [access]
  51. Start, Daniel and Ingie Hovland. 2004. Tools for policy impact. A handbook for researchers. Research and Policy in Development (Rapid). London, United Kingdom: Overseas Development Institute (ODI). [access]
  52. Stockholm Resilience Centre. 2010. “Doing stakeholder participation the right way.” Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm Resilience Centre. [access]
  53. USAID. 1991. Stakeholder analysis: a vital tool for strategic managers. Prepared by Benjamin L. Crosby. Technical Note, no. 2, March 1991. Washington DC, United States: USAID. [access]
  54. Wikipedia. n.d. “Stakeholder.” [access]
  55. Wikipedia. n.d. “Stakeholder analysis.” [access]
  56. Wikipedia. n.d. “Stakeholder (corporate).” [access]
  57. Wikipedia. n.d. “Stakeholder engagement.” [access]
  58. Wikipedia. n.d. “Stakeholder management.” [access]
  59. Wikipedia. n.d. “Stakeholder theory.” [access]
  60. World Bank. 1995. World Bank participation sourcebook. Washington DC, United States: World Bank. [access]
  61. World Bank. 2001. Interest groups and organizations as stakeholders. Paper, no. 35, June 2001. Washington DC, United States: World Bank. [access]
  62. World Bank. 2002. “Stakeholder analysis.” Draft, PSIA workshop. Washington DC, United States: World Bank. [access]
  63. World Bank. 2003. “Guidance note: stakeholder analysis.” Washington DC, United States: World Bank. [access]
  64. World Bank. 2003. Social analysis sourcebook. Incorporating social dimensions into Bank-supported projects. Washington DC, United States: World Bank. [access]
  65. World Bank. 2003. A user’s guide to poverty and social impact analysis. Washington DC, United States: Poverty Reduction Group and Social Development Dept., World Bank. [access]
  66. World Bank. 2003. “Stakeholder analysis.” In: A user’s guide to poverty and social impact analysis, p 49. Washington DC, United States: Poverty Reduction Group and Social Development Dept., World Bank. [access]
  67. World Bank. 2004. Operationalizing political analysis: the Expected Utility Stakeholder Model and governance reforms. PREM notes, no. 95, November 2004. Washington DC, United States: World Bank. [access]
  68. World Bank. 2009. Guidance note on Bank multi-stakeholder engagement. Washington DC, United States: World Bank. [access]
  69. World Bank. 2010. “Analysis of reform context: Macro-level stakeholder analysis.” In: PSIA Sourcebook. Washington DC, United States: World Bank. [access]
  70. World Bank. 2010. “Tool name: Force-field analysis.” In: PSIA Sourcebook (online). Washington DC, United States: World Bank. [access]
  71. World Bank. 2010. “Tool name: Macro and micro political mapping.” In: PSIA Sourcebook (online). Washington DC, United States: World Bank. [access]
  72. World Bank. 2010. “Tool name: Meso-level stakeholder analysis.” In: PSIA Sourcebook (online). Washington DC, United States: World Bank. [access]
  73. World Bank. 2010. “Tool name: Stakeholder analysis matrices.” In: PSIA Sourcebook (online). Washington DC, United States: World Bank. [access]
  74. World Bank. 2010. “Stakeholder analysis.” In: Social analysis (online). Washington DC, United States: World Bank. [access]
  75. World Bank. n.d. “Simplified stakeholder analysis. A demonstration.” By Nisha Narayanan and Stephen Ndegwa. Washington DC, United States: World Bank. [access]
  76. World Bank. n.d. “Getting serious about stakeholder analysis. Piloting political science methods in World Bank operational work. EAP pilot.” Washington DC, United States: World Bank. [access]
  77. World Bank. n.d. “Stakeholder analysis on Moroccan cereal reform.” By Nabil Chaherli and Jennie Litvack. Washington DC, United States: World Bank. [access]
  78. World Bank. 2005. Social analysis guidelines in natural resource management. Incorporating social dimensions into Bank-supported projects. Washington DC, United States: World Bank. [access]
  79. WWF. 2005. Cross-cutting tool. Stakeholder analysis. By Bronwen Golder and Beg Gawler. Gland, Switzerland: World Wildlife Fund International. [access]

Social analysis

(Information to be added)